Reference Text
Time Left10:00
Everyone
is
entitled
to
presumptions
of
the
guilt
or
innocence
of
a
convict.
And
this
applies
equally
to
those
who
hold
high
public
office
as
it
does
to
ordinary
citizens.
But
it
is
one
thing
for
Jayant
Sinha,
Union
Minister
of
State
for
Civil
Aviation,
to
have
serious
reservations
about
the
verdict
of
the
fast
track
court
in
Jharkhand
that
convicted,
and
sentenced,
a
bunch
of
people
to
life
imprisonment
in
a
cow
vigilantism
case.
It
is
quite
another
to
felicitate
those
convicted
merely
because
they
were
let
out
on
bail
by
the
Jharkhand
High
Court.
A
release
on
bail,
as
Mr.
Sinha
surely
knows,
is
not
an
acquittal.
The
eight
garlanded
men
he
posed
with
for
celebratory
photos
are
still
convicts,
who
were
tried
in
a
case
in
which
a
meat
trader
was
savagely
beaten
to
death
on
suspicion
of
transporting
beef.
That
a
Central
Minister
could
have
hobnobbed
in
such
a
public
fashion
with
those
convicted
of
murder
is
inexcusable.
As
a
lawmaker,
he
ought
to
have
known
that
doing
so
would
raise
inevitable
questions
in
the
public
mind
about
his
commitment
to
the
rule
of
law
and
his
lack
of
faith
in
the
criminal
justice
system.
In
doing
what
he
did,
he
allowed
his
personal
beliefs
to
trump
his
public
responsibilities.
Mr.
Sinha
has
declared
that
he
is
against
any
kind
of
vigilantism
and
all
forms
of
violence.
His
defence
for
his
grave
lapse
lies
in
a
fine
distinction.
He
believes
there
is
a
difference
between
the
eight
who
were
let
out
on
bail
and
some
others
who
participated
in
the
murderous
assault.
While
it
is
true
that
the
group
of
eight
was
released
from
prison
on
the
ground
that
the
available
visual
evidence
showed
them
only
as
onlookers
as
opposed
to
assaulters,
the
Jharkhand
High
Court's
order
is
not
a
proclamation
of
innocence.
This
depends
on
the
outcome
of
the
appeal
something
that
Mr.
Sinha
did
not
care
to
wait
for.
From
the
string
of
statements
he
made
on
social
media,
it
is
far
from
clear
whether
Mr.
Sinha
has
so
much
as
paused
to
consider,
leave
alone
care
about,
what
the
eight
were
doing
at
the
scene
of
the
crime.
This
strengthens
the
charge
that
narrow
political
considerations,
as
opposed
to
a
presumed
miscarriage
of
justice,
played
a
role
in
his
action
to
first
champion
their
innocence
and
then
to
celebrate
their
release.
His
clarifications
notwithstanding,
Mr.
Sinha
has
lent
the
impression
he
has
been
guided
by
the
political
exigencies
that
prevail
in
his
Hazaribagh
Lok
Sabha
constituency,
where
the
murder
took
place.
Wittingly
or
unwittingly,
he
has
opened
himself
up
to
the
charge
that
he
is
indulging
cow
vigilantism
and
taking
sides
on
the