Reference Text
Time Left10:00
In
a
vital
decision
that
will
help
secure
the
rights
of
Internet
users
in
the
country,
the
Telecom
Commission
has
approved
the
recommendations
of
the
Telecom
Regulatory
Authority
of
India
(TRAI)
on
net
neutrality.
By
endorsing
steps
that
call
for
amendments
to
access
services
licences
for
Internet
Service
Providers
(ISPs)
and
Telecom
Operators,
the
Commission
has
made
it
clear
that
any
violation
of
net
neutrality
will
be
treated
as
a
violation
of
the
licence
conditions.
It
has
said
that
some
specialised
and
emerging
services
such
as
Voice
over
Internet
Protocol
(VoIP)
may
be
exempt
from
the
non-discriminatory
principles,
but
these
cannot
be
at
the
cost
of
the
overall
quality
of
Internet
access.
Combining
this
approval
with
the
fact
that
TRAI
had
barred
telecom
service
providers
from
charging
differential
rates
for
data
services
(zero
rating,
for
example),
India
will
now
have
among
the
strongest
net
neutrality
regulations.
This
is
as
it
should
be.
Net
neutrality
is
the
basic
principle
of
an
open
Internet
that
does
not
allow
for
content
discrimination
by
ISPs.
The
user
is
free
to
access
any
web
location
at
the
same
paid-for
speed
without
any
discrimination
by
the
ISP.
This
proviso
has
helped
democratise
the
Internet
and
undergird
its
growth
from
a
networked
system
of
computers
that
enabled
e-commerce,
social
interaction,
knowledge
flow
and
entertainment,
among
other
functions.
Internet
pioneers
including
World
Wide
Web
inventor
Tim
Berners-Lee
and
Transmission
Control
Protocol/IP
Protocol
co-inventor
Vint
Cerf
have
consistently
maintained
that
the
principle
of
net
neutrality
is
built
into
the
structure
of
the
Internet
itself.
The
layers
and
protocols
for
connectivity
via
the
network
have
been
erected
in
such
a
way
that
access
is
seamless
irrespective
of
the
nature
of
the
physical
infrastructure
of
the
network.
It
is
to
the
credit
of
the
Telecom
Commission
and
TRAI
that
this
principle
has
been
upheld
in
India
in
contrast,
in
the
U.S.,
on
President
Donald
Trump's
watch,
the
Federal
Communications
Commission
repealed
net
neutrality
regulations
that
had
been
put
in
place
by
the
Barack
Obama
administration.
The
repeal
was
ostensibly
to
allow
ISPs
and
broadband
providers
to
invest
in
new
technology
although
evidence
shows
that
such
investment
was
not
affected
by
the
regulations.
The
other
argument
for
the
repeal
has
been
a
functional
one,
suggesting
that
the
Internet
is
very
different
today,
controlled
by
a
handful
of
big
companies,
unlike
the
much
more
egalitarian
environment
earlier;
and
that
therefore,
the
principle
is
redundant
now.
This
is
misleading.
In
India,
for
instance,
the
steep
growth
in
Internet
access
and
use
has
allowed
for
newer
services
to
thrive.
The
government
should
now
ensure
that
net
neutrality
is
followed
in
practice.
In
a
vital
decision
that
will
help
secure
the
rights
of
Internet
users
in